Saturday, March 31, 2012

I am a senior graduating in May 2012 with a B.A. in Women’s Studies

I am a senior graduating in May 2012 with a B.A. in Women's Studies. In addition to this program, I minored in public health, studied abroad in Madagascar, and followed the premed track. One of the most outstanding academic experience I have had was deciding to be a women's studies major. Two courses from my major had a particularly strong impact on my life.

The first was during the Spring semester of my sophomore year and was titled Women in and Beyond The Global Prison. There were five students in my class, which was taught by the director of the Women's Studies Program. For the first time at GW, I had ample opportunity to speak as often as I wanted, to really grapple with the text, examine my peers' perspectives, and not have to fight for access to my professor during office hours. Professor Moshenberg is an active advocate and researcher for the demographic expressed in the subject matter. Through him we had access to grass-root activities, current literature, and various movement activists and leaders. He brought in several speakers, including the previously incarcerated and those who work in jails. This course made me seriously consider changing my career goal of being a neonatologist to being a physician/social worker at a prison facility.

Later, I enrolled in my senior capstone course, during the Fall 2011 semester. Similar to Women in and Beyond The Global Prison, I read 10-12 books and articles related to a variety of feminist theories and their intersectionality with politics, consumerism, the media, and health. There were five students in this class as well, and I had the same exhilarating feel to come to this class. I wanted to work through the texts, hear my professor's commentary, and engage in discussion with my peers.

Without these small class sizes and the quality of these instructors my enthusiasm for academics at GW would not be as ecstatic as it is now! 

Natasha T. Dupee
The George Washington University
Columbian College of Arts and Sciences
B.A. Women's Studies, Expected 2012
Stephen Joel Trachtenberg Scholar, 2008
GW Colonial Cabinet Member, 2010
Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr Award Recipient, 2012
Student Coordinator, GW Center for Student Engagement
President, Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Incorporated, Xi Sigma Chapter
Brother, Alpha Chi Sigma Fraternity, Incorporated, Alpha Pi Chapter
Class of 2012 Representative, GW Class Council
ntdupee@gwmail.gwu.edu

Monday, March 26, 2012

2012 Yulee Lecture, Wednesday, Mar 29: What Would Harriet Do? Unfinished Liberation or the Dangers of Innocence by Ruth Wilson Gilmore


What Would Harriet Do? Unfinished Liberation or the Dangers of Innocence
by Ruth Wilson Gilmore
2012 Yulee Endowed Lecture

Wednesday, March 28, 2012, 6:30 p.m.
Marvin Center, Room 309
800 21st Street, NW
Washington, DC 20052
Free and Open to the Public
The world is in crisis and -- as everybody knows -- the effects of structural adjustment and organized abandonment fall most heavily on the shoulders of those most burdened by the cares of everyday life in the first place. In this talk I will discuss some of the crisis-driven opportunities in changing the scale and scope of the prison-industrial complex, and argue that the struggle against the all-purpose use of criminalization to solve social, political, economic, and cultural problems cannot be won with an appeal either to “innocence” or to naming “the real criminals.” That said, how we account for how we got to where we are determines in part what alternative futures we might make. Using the story of Harriet Tubman as a model and case, I will conclude with an argument about what I call the “infrastructure of feeling” and what it means to work in the Black Radical Tradition.
Ruth Wilson Gilmore is Professor of Geography in the Earth and Environmental Studies Ph.D. program at the Graduate Center of the City University of New York. Her prize-winning book is Golden Gulag: Prisons, Surplus, Crisis, and Opposition in Globalizing California, published in 2007. She is a founding member of California Prison Moratorium Project; Critical Resistance; the Central California Environmental Justice Network; and many other organizations.

Friday, March 2, 2012

Radical Feminisms & Occupy: Panel Event, Wed Mar 7, GWU



As one who was an activist and a radical pre-occupy (as I have been during- and will be post-), I had mixed feelings upon occupy’s initial momentum. It is nice to be surprised once in a while. A friend put it best—“if someone had told you five years ago that Adbusters would be responsible for the next US protest movement, and that Crimethinc would be providing useful, levelheaded discourse on it, would you have believed them?” Not a chance. So when it kicked off, I was extremely skeptical. I had long ago dismissed anything resembling a mass mobilization as being unable to enact real change in the USA. Instead, I cast my lot (as did many of my friends and colleagues) with what we call somewhat euphemistically “long term movement building”: direct services, raising funds and resources for said direct services, and small-scale community building. But I was also excited that the national conversation was approaching a critique of capitalism, excited for there to be a left movement in the USA again, and intrigued by the possibilities of the encampment tactic. Occupy’s connection to the “Arab Spring” in the national imagination gave it a particularly tantalizing flavor of possibility.

On paper, occupy is inherently aligned with feminist critiques of power. The heart of occupy is an objection to unearned power—the same objection at the heart of work seeking to dismantle patriarchy, white supremacy, homophobia, ableism, and the myriad intersectional oppressions that both sustain the ruling order (or in the parlance of occupy, the 1%) and keep the 99% divided and conquered.

But at large and locally, the internal and external dynamics of the movement have not always reflected that ideological alignment which seems at once so obvious and so necessary. Instead, the physical spaces of occupy have often replicated oppressive social relationships, when they should have been sanctuaries for those who need it the most—people experiencing homelessness, people of color, queer and trans* people, women in need of shelter and childcare, and survivors of violence, to name a few. Also, the conversation within occupy seems to have shifted to mainstream liberal concerns such as Citizens United and away from poverty and structural violence.

Occupy’s shift to liberal values, if not tactics, did not come as a total surprise. Radicals have long known to be wary of our liberal and moderate compatriots. They can sometimes be our worst enemy or biggest obstacle, as The Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. so eloquently expressed in “Letter from a Birmingham Jail”:

 …the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom…lukewarm acceptance is much more bewildering than outright rejection.

This is why a feminist critique is essential to occupy. We have got to keep an eye on the people who claim to be speaking for us or on our behalf, but are not. It is not a lack of demands or incoherence of message that weakens the occupy movement, but the lack of a radical analysis, and the unwillingness of privileged people within the movement to step back and let the movement be directed by the needs of its most marginalized participants.

For moderated panel discussion of this and more—where is occupy going in relation to labor? To academia?—please attend a panel Wednesday, March 7th, at 5:30 in the Teamster Research Center at Gelman Library (suite 702).

Beck Levy, becklevy@gmail.com

Thursday, March 1, 2012

Meet The Women Workers Who Sew GWU Apparel! Monday, March 5, GWU


Meet The Women Workers Who Sew GWU Apparel! 


Monday, March 5, 6 – 8, Philips Hall 414A

The GWU Women’s Studies Program invites you!

Come hear first-hand from two courageous union leaders at the Alta Gracia factory, Maritza Vargas and Ana Marinez, about how their community is being transformed by living wages.

Thanks to more than a decade of cross-border collaborations between the Fedotrazonas union and students, Alta Gracia brings living-wage college-logo t-shirts and hoodies to over 400 university bookstores nation-wide. Join us for a discussion of how to bring living-wage and union-made apparel to George Washington University!

Set at more than three and a half times the Dominican minimum wage and based on a cost of living study conducted by independent labor rights watchdog Workers Rights Consortium, workers receive a “salario digno”, which enables them to support their families with dignity, covering food, housing, transportation, health care and education costs for their children. The ripple effect in the community is impressive: new businesses have opened across from the factory, construction has picked up as workers invest in more livable homes, and not just children, but Alta Gracia workers themselves are going back to school to continue where poverty had forced them to abandon studies. At Alta Gracia, workers enjoy top health and safety standards at work and a union – a voice on the job. 

For a bit of background on Alta Gracia, this recent article in The Nation is helpful. This video on the impact of living wages at Alta Gracia in union leader Martiza Vargas’ family and this quick video about the project’s history, made by students in United Students Against Sweatshops might also be useful overviews.

Tiffany Finck-Haynes